The local plans, investments and decisions worth following.
5 selected records checked against official sources. A plan is not a completed project; each record shows the stage its source establishes.
Bridlington
Chantry Court sheltered housing
Replacement sheltered flats are planned after demolition.
Demolition completed; construction forecast for autumn 2026 · source does not state a status date
Responsible body: East Riding of Yorkshire Council
What the source says: The council programme lists 56 flats. The forecast start is not confirmation of construction.
Next thing to establish: What dated decision or progress report confirms the current stage?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- Named project location only. No official impact boundary has been matched to current wards; proximity does not establish a ward-wide benefit.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Council housing investment programme →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Adapt older housing to current needs →
Make room for homes people can afford →
Target support where disadvantages overlap →
How to track delivery →Goole
Eastgate Flats review
Surveys are testing the suitability and cost of refurbishing older flats.
Assessment and survey work · source does not state a status date
Responsible body: East Riding of Yorkshire Council
What the source says: Options include layout and energy improvements. No completed refurbishment is inferred.
Next thing to establish: What dated decision or progress report confirms the current stage?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- Named project location only. No official impact boundary has been matched to current wards; proximity does not establish a ward-wide benefit.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Council housing investment programme →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Adapt older housing to current needs →
Make room for homes people can afford →
Target support where disadvantages overlap →
How to track delivery →Skipsea, Church Farm
Church Farm coastal relocation homes
Social rented homes are being developed with priority for residents affected by coastal erosion.
Project underway July 2026 · evidence dated 2026-07-22
Responsible body: Council, Broadacres and Homes England
What the source says: Nine homes are planned inland. They do not remove the wider erosion risk.
Next thing to establish: What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- Named project location only. No official impact boundary has been matched to current wards; proximity does not establish a ward-wide benefit.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Housing for residents affected by coastal erosion →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Support households facing coastal loss →
Make room for homes people can afford →
Target support where disadvantages overlap →
How to track delivery →Bridlington West; Withernsea East and Patrington
Pride in Place neighbourhood plans
Residents and local boards are preparing priorities for long-term investment.
Programme preparation; plans due for approval in November 2026 · source does not state a status date
Responsible body: Neighbourhood boards and council
What the source says: Funding and boards do not mean individual projects are delivered.
Next thing to establish: What dated decision or progress report confirms the current stage?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- Named project location only. No official impact boundary has been matched to current wards; proximity does not establish a ward-wide benefit.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Pride in Place neighbourhood programmes →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Make neighbourhood investment reflect local priorities →
Connect local skills to local opportunities →
Target support where disadvantages overlap →
How to track delivery →Hall Road, Goole
Marshlands Family Hub
An existing local hub offers family services and facilities.
Operating service listed by the council · source does not state a status date
Responsible body: East Riding of Yorkshire Council
What the source says: Check the service listing for activities, access and bookings.
Next thing to establish: What dated decision or progress report confirms the current stage?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- Named project location only. No official impact boundary has been matched to current wards; proximity does not establish a ward-wide benefit.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Marshlands Family Hub, Goole →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Use existing family support in Goole →
Target support where disadvantages overlap →
How to track delivery →